Hello.

I wonder why tagging (name of) a mosque should be this way, instead of e.g.

1. way/5983916
2. way/241107520

... instead? Is there a discussion going on somewhere?

Many thanks for updating these structures: osm.org/go/4GooPcUB9--?m=

These happened to be an accommodation for tourists as well, hence, "building structures" was mapped by me after I visited there on 2016.

@angys:

You sure about that? Variety store is much like Eco-Shop or Zon Jimat where (almost) everything is sold at a flat price of RM 2.10 (or RM 5, RM 10, etc) in Zon Jimat.

99 Speedmart doesn't do that IIRC.

shop=variety_store

You might want to check your edit, apparently Sumatera went under water again

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/8882668

Who introduced them? Of course, absolutely non-local, remote mappers.

*well, except if roads under construction appear ready to traffic, then it's A-OK

Sorry for the interruption, but please proceed with your amendments. I'm not sure what was going on with this mapper, the last time there was problems coming from this same mapper as well.

Hi, thanks for your reply!

I rest my case: these kind of controlled access highway would somehow provide way in and out through (grade-separated) interchange, rather than a simple four-way junction.

*this completely controlled-access highway, still under construction

Are you really sure that these:
- node/7943139920
- node/7943139919

will somehow connect to one another, when this controlled-access highway will be completed sooner?

Remote mappers from afar, I'll be delighted to provide ground level proof to show that there are no separate "highway links".

Read this for context as well:
https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/59#issuecomment-692530410

I'm happy to provide street level photos, if needed.

Sorry, way/763058445 was "upgraded" into a residential highway. And please check other edits as well, replacing ground truth checking.

Again, I believe Apple Data Team loves consistency, but ground truth suggest otherwise.

I'm not sure why this reclassification thing is still going on and on, wasting ground truth efforts.

Does way/707585955 look like a residential highway? See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=794935#p794935

The road I was on is way/707585955

I wonder why ground truth edits from me were undid.

way/829318424 goes into a school ground. I wonder why it is mapped as a residential highway?

Quote:

We only map roads in OSM as dual-carriageway (two ways going in both directions) only if there is a physical barrier or median separating the two directions. If it's just a painted line, just map it as a single way in OSM.

Unquote. Such links should not be mapped.

https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/59#issuecomment-692530410

One more thing: such areas are not placed under a military control too.

> Analogue (similar) practices around the world were not mapped like this as well.

This is regarding areas of stricter lockdowns which may be found elsewhere globally.

landuse=military suggests an area for any kind of military-related activities e.g. camps, administrative offices and the likes.

Analogue (similar) practices around the world were not mapped like this as well. Still, I'm happy to be corrected.

Sure, there may be some inclination to actually show these on a map. Since this is a (hopefully) temporary non-physical feature, it would be best to be shared through e.g. uMap: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/

Even countries under military leadership are not wholly mapped as a landuse=military.

You sure this should be mapped as a trunk link? way/453657110