Hi Skipper, I removed your edit on this restriction relation https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/5371904 based on this image https://bit.ly/3vapEVe. if there is any update around, please let me know. thank you

Hi fbello,
can you confirm this restriction relation role https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/3938478 ? I found it weird as the "from" role has an opposite highway member to the "to" role. i think it might be the opposite.

Hi Valmirdm,
please have a look at your last month edit of restriction type relation. looks like this https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/8724198 relation missing a "from" role. there is only to and via. thank you

Hello mate,

I have made some modifications to your edits on this building relation https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/7414734. Since building is prohibited to draw as relation as stated here building=church, I transform the church boundary into an amenity area which including all of your information, while the building itself only contains building: church tag.

finally, with the amenity area tag, the church area will render in OSM differently that show exactly the edge of the church area that has different render color compared to building color.

very happy to hear your feedback.. thanks mate..

Hi mate,
it was great reading your explanation. I think i also have to discuss with the original mapper that added that restriction. I agree, it should be repaired. I deleted the relation based on whether the restriction is exists or not both physically (traffic sign) and visually. thanks for your kind response :)

Ah i see... very happy to hear that from local mapper. i might also wanna ask. is it fine to give a u turn restriction in OSM although it doesnt have any restriction sign on the field, maybe in Argentina it's a common way ? thank you in advance for your kind response and shared knowledge.

Hi..
Could you please check your relation edit in 2018 on this link ? https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/8496698. I found an opensource image on mapilary https://is.gd/6GTnj8. But i could not find any sign of no_u_turn on that relation. can u validate this image ? thank you very much.

Hi Omotesando
on your past changeset https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102123106. you added a no-turn left restriction to that way. in fact, there is no restriction from and to role of your edits, hence, I remove it. please have a look thank you in advance.

Hi FenyMufyd

after researching the traffic flow of this area, also found out that the no turn right sign on your relation edit https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/11092736 should be placed at the node where there are a navigable route exist. So i moved the "via", "from" and "to" role to the next road section. please have a look.

Hi Martin

I remove your added restriction relation on this changeset https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/9919425. Cause on the role "to", there was no routable way to go cause it was a oneway road that opposite to the direction of the relation hence, no need to add restriction since it was oneway road. please have a look

Hi, can you clarify this way ? https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/555020055. it contains long bridge tag. there is also an unknown tag embankment=yes. in OSM wiki it is man_made=embankment. thank you

Hi angys, I have made minor geometric modifications to this natural=water polygon https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/683564517 so it doesn't cross the highway around. Have a look, if my edits are not appropriate according to your local understanding of the surrounding environment please let me know.

Hi, I just realign the node https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/6554695409 that you might be accidentally moved.

Hi Bud, Looks like this road pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/805518169 already well constructed. I changed it to tertiary to match with your edit class https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/631990017. Have a look at this. thank you..

Hi, this node I have split your added way in 2017 right on this node https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/7874451489. I could nit find any clue how this way connected to the way accros the river. Have a look if you found my modified edit is not appropriate.

Hello Quả Chuối Tái, I have improved and updated some of your data around this changeset based on current satellite imagery and wikiOSM guideline. thanks !!

btw I also improve some of your data around the above link so it matched with current satellite imagery and wikiOSM guideline. just a minor edit.

Hi LHQUAN, I found this way https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/768989396 and couldn't find any imagery that could help me to figure out where the bridge was. it would be nice for me to get the local information from you. might be I am missing something. thanks !!

thank you btw

already fixed mate looks like it was the residual of a simplified way.