The line has service=siding, but a rail way can't cross like that.

Hi @tadcan You appear to have modified a bit of rail way that may duplicate and crosses an existing line. I can't see a second line (one is a bit of a challenge!) here in the recent DRC imagery. Do you think the second piece should be deleted?
Adrian

You also have what appears to be a duplicate highway going south west from Buyamaba. You mapped it first in 2021, and again this month.

The duplication exists for other residential areas in the general locality.

Hi hebolz. 22 days ago you appear to have created a duplicate residential area way/1427170300over way/532079122. While yours has more detail, I think the OSM preference is to edit existing features, not replace.

Adrian

Hi Robert,

Good catch. I had it next to the wrong gateway. I've now replaced some hedge with fence to the west of the error and relocated the AED appropriately.

How did you detect my error?

Adrian

Hi, I was wondering why the brand:wikidata tag has now been prefixed with not: The value is correct for the brand.
Adrian

Fair enough Jan. Nice to know it's a common trap :-)
Adrian

Ah my apologies Jan, I put the source in the next changeset. I used https://metar-taf.com/metar/GB-0843. It looks like a weather station reference. So perhaps the node should be tagged ref:metar_taf=* of even a separate man_made=monitoring_station node with the same ref? Advice?
Adrian

Apologies for my tardy response John, poor email management on my part. It was no problem for me, I just came across it while touching on the longer relation (effectively a longer route) this footpath is part of.
Adrian

Thank you Jan, I agree I had it wrong, The reference is now applied to the aerodrome node. I see you have corrected the runway.

Hi John,

There is an untagged way (part of a relation) across what looks like a field and fenced off pub garden. Does such a path really exist on the ground, or should the paths running north then west from the SE corner be part of the Augustine Camino route relation instead?

Adrian

Hi Mike,

I think you've changed Shillingford Lane to a Track from Unclassified based on condition. I think this is incorrect, the road should be Unclassified, even if it has grass growing down the middle and potholes (sadly now too common). Track is for access to fields and foodland etc. highway=track

Adrian

No problem. I had started doing the same, then noticed I had drifted outside. Not sure of the protocol in such a situation. I'm not aware of an adjoining project underway.

Polygons modified. I didn't map the original polygons, but just tidied up a little. Odd to plant a managed forest in the middle of what looks like a natural wood. Unless it fills in something else?

Thank you Antonin, I just wanted to know to improve my overall OSM/HOT understanding.
Adrian

Hi, I'd like to understand what was the reason for this large revert changeset? Clearly something bigger than an individual error.

Regards,

Adrian

Thank you, are you now validating this project?

Imagery showing route to join track to remaining highway obscured by cloud.

You're right, but something odd has happened. The Vespucci bounding box of the data I edited does not stretch that far, so how the symbol moved from bottom left to top right of the new changeset bounding box i don't know. Looking at OSM on PC shows odd text parts at original location.