hat der Tag wikidata=4 an Weg 841397279 etwas zu bedeuten? Wenn nicht, sollte er gelöscht werden.

I have already set this tag in the next 6 changesets. I will leave it out in future, except I know it is really a CAI route.

Da dies neu gebaute Anlagen sind, passt es dass die zu folgendem Windpark gehören?
BNA1921 EEV Unternehmen Erneuerbare Energien Verwaltungs GmbH Dresden Startdatum 29.09.2016 16 MW (Kraftwerksliste Bundesnetzagentur)

Wieso hast du bei der Biogasanlage (way id 194740794) den Brennstoff von Biomasse auf Erdgas geändert? hast du dafür eine Quellenangabe?
Meintest du vielleicht generator:source=biogas?

Allora deviamo ponere generator:output:electricity=2 MW e generator:output:electricity=18 MW.

Se usa con un " ": "2 MW" e non "2MW", vedi anche https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/generator%3Aoutput%3Aelectricity#values

Penso che possiamo eliminare generator:capacity perché questo è già espresso con generator:output:electricity.

When switching from power=generator to power=plant, one should also switch the other generator:* tags to plant:* tags

Ciao scratera,
Cosa vuoi dire con generator:capacity?
Perché hai cambiato il tag generator:output:electricity da 2 MW a 100000 senza aggiungere una unità?
Saluti, Mark

Falls du auf meine Antwort wartest, ich sehe das der Beschreibung nach auch als private an. Wenn die Tore verschlossen sind sodass man nicht reinkommt, ist das ziemlich eindeutig private und es sollte auch keiner über diese Wege geroutet werden.

Falls außen noch der Name dransteht und damit noch beim Zurechtfinden genutzt werden kann, sollte ein Lifecycle prefix für die nicht mehr zutreffenden Eigenschaften verwendet werden. Hier könnte man z.B. folgendes setzen:
disused:amenity=cafe
name=Sandhof, Café
Siehe auch osm.wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Benvenuto a Openstreetmap!
Scusa, io non parlo molto Italiano. Hai chiesto che qualcuno vede sul tuo cambio, qui è cio che ho per aggiungere:
Grazie per aggiungere questa via. Al sud-est è connesso all'altra via, ma al nort-ovest è solo quasi aggiunto. Le applicazioni non possono usare buono se non è connesso.

La direzione della via non è il suo nome, i mapper avvanzati usano i tag destination:forward e destination:backward. (Destination è inglese per destinazione, e sulle strade si usa direzione).
Lo ho già cambiano nel changeset changeset/97008800
Per favore rispondi a questo commento, se non tu aggiungi la via alle altre vie, anche io posso lo fare.
In futuro è benissimo se aggiungi i monti (ad esempio "tre monti") e il rifugio.

Non è normale che qualcuno aggiunge qualcosa con questo grado di dettaglio (surface, smoothness, tracktype, horse and vehicle access), molto grazie.

Thank you for mapping, as you requested someone to look for this changeset, I'll write my thoughts on it.
It is not important if the land or path is private. If the public allowed to go there and the owner cannot revoke this, it is access=yes (or do not use access=* at all, as this is the default.
If the public can go there but the owner can forbid it in the future, access=permissive is right.
Only if the public is not to go there, then access=private is the right one.

Usually all paths in an area have the same access=*, so you should update the other ways, too.
Your changeset comments were in English, so I write English. I speak also German. Feel free to ask using this discussion.

access=destination ist hier genau der richtige Tag. Wer Kunde ist, hat hier das Ziel und darf daher als Anlieger reinfahren. osm.wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Ddestination

Ist unten die Brücke auch nur für Anlieger? Dürfen eventuell Radfahrer die Wege als Durchgang benutzen?

You missed to name some parts of the Spree, is this intended? If not, reply here, I can also add the names.
On https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=96858824 you can see which parts are missing. Thanks for mapping

Looks mostly fine for me.
You could add a source for your changeset. I don't know where you have the street names and the other knowledge from. By walking by (field_work), open data from government etc...

I think this is more a leisure=playground. For mapping specific playground objects (they are not often mapped) this site could be helpful: playground=*

Thank you for your contribution! You requested a review on your change, and here are my comments:

You modified the position and shape of the Pavilion and added the club's website.

What you could improve is the following:
-After drawing a building, you shoud make the edges rectangular. You can do this by right-clicking on the line and select the square symbol.
-On Bing imagery the building is a bit less to the north-eastern corner, it is shorter.
-One thing for advanced users, another user introduced this tag: "leisure=club" is no more used, it can be deleted as there is already the tag "club=sport"

Feel free to also comment on this changeset if you have questions.

Okay, dann kann ich also alle Leitungen und Verzweigungen der Leitungen von Lizzana als 120000V taggen?
Mich wundert, dass beim Kraftwerk San Colombano auch 132kV steht (ist auf openinframap.org nordöstlich von Lizzana)

(Parlo Tedesco, Inglese e un poco Italiano)
Ho pensato che le linie elettriche hanno la stessa tensione come la sottostazione (way/66714650).
Poi quasi tutti le mie modifiche di oggi sono con errori, mi dispiace.
Se può invertire in forma fàcile?
Quale linea ha 120 kV?

Danke für den Hinweis und die Korrektur. Ich habe nicht gewusst, dass hier nicht die Webseite sondern die Kontaktadresse eingetragen wird und auch ohne vorangestelltes @

source=mapillary;aerial_imagery