好像确实是郑州

搞错，是洛阳

Because node/10111440509 node/10111440510 node/10111440512 node/10111440513 was given, so if someone enter this junction area he will meet with 2 traffic light node, not 1.

Here's a reflection on osm.wiki/Named_spots_instead_of_street_names

This isn't even edited with Bing's basemap because Bing's basemap sucks in China
I didn't test many editors in China, and unsurprisingly most of them were not brought to OSM

Director of Bing Maps If you accidentally see this changeset, I‘m willing to talk to you

Reverted in changeset/131988686

Because we don't use residential area for administration mapping.

If you have more question about this, you can join t.me/osmchina for further information.

Reverted in changeset/131988358

Because we don't use residential area for administration mapping.

If you have more question about this, you can join t.me/osmchina for further information.

Reverted in changeset/130059456

Because we don't use residential area for administration mapping.

If you have more question about this, you can join t.me/osmchina for further information.

This is truly human drawn, not by AI automatic recognized.

I draw this because those places looks blank, and if you have more detailed dataset want to import, or my unproper edit make trouble for local editors, revert or delete it.

Thank you!

I draw this because those places looks blank, and if you have more detailed dataset want to import, or my unproper edit make trouble for local editors, revert or delete it.

Thank you!

I draw this because those places looks blank, and if you have more detailed dataset want to import, or my unproper edit make trouble for local editors, revert or delete it.

Thank you!

I draw this because those places looks blank, and if you have more detailed dataset want to import, or my unproper edit make trouble for local editors, revert or delete it.

Thank you!

总而言之，言而总之，operator:type = consortium（财团）是显然不合适的，查询了武昌区教育局的公办小学划片名单有这两所，应该认为是公办，记教育局作为operator

您好，不知道您出于什么原因（或许只是觉得铁路在地图上更突出一些？）使用铁路来绘制了公园内的步行道路，而这显然会给读图和使用数据的人造成非常大的困扰。
您到目前为止的4个changeset我已全部审阅完毕。我已在 changeset/131415266 中尽力修正。

Thank you for completing the ferry route between China and Korea in 130231218 and 131166007 （130231218과 131166007의 중국과 한국 간의 페리 항로를 완성해 주셔서 감사합니다.）

因为这是中国大陆的标注规范所决定的，在这一区域习惯即是name、name:zh均使用简体中文，正如在台湾使用繁体中文一样

osm.wiki/Multilingual_names#China

This is not a fictional edit because according to satelite map this center does exist

Here is screenshot evidence:
https://imgur.com/a/DLvTsCQ

changeset/130623555 中您评论了完全一致的内容，这里就不再逐个回复了

如果您真的看了文档，那您就应当看到这条内容：

Warning
Note that generally, OpenStreetMap requires information to be verifiable on the ground. Proposed features that are not visible on the ground should therefore only be mapped in exceptional cases and after a discussion with the relevant OSM community, lest they might be deleted for lack of verifiability.

！“还有这事？”
那辛苦您了！

顺便我看到way/136512038居然是不存在的，仅凭卫星图真的会以为这里有道路直通。

俗话说的好，再一再二不再三，但我看您一共是画了四次海峡大桥的changeset
如果继续看到这类编辑的话，陆台两侧联合行动给您封号的可能性将大幅增加