Maybe my comment before is a bit reckless, so, for the correct name of this path that maybe have a religious meaning, this problem remains for Arabic mapper to solve.

Maybe my comment before is a bit reckless, so, for the correct name of this path that maybe have a religious meaning, this problem remains for Arabic mapper to solve.

Maybe my comment before is a bit reckless, so, for the correct name of this path that maybe have a religious meaning, this problem remains for Arabic mapper to solve.

Maybe my comment before is a bit reckless, so, for the correct name of this path that maybe have a religious meaning, this problem remains for Arabic mapper to solve.

Maybe my comment before is a bit reckless, so, for the correct name of this path that maybe have a religious meaning, this problem remains for Arabic mapper to solve.

Maybe my comment before is a bit reckless, so, for the correct name of this path that maybe have a religious meaning, this problem remains for Arabic mapper to solve.

Maybe my comment before is a bit reckless, so, for the correct name of this path that maybe have a religious meaning, this problem remains for Arabic mapper to solve.
（But in this changeset，the shape is roughly correct，if name is uncorrect，go to fix the name）

If you think this name is offensive in your language and cultures, just revert and fix those unsuitable content.

Maybe my comment before is a bit reckless, so, for the correct name of this path that maybe have a religious meaning, this problem remains for Arabic mapper to solve.
Thanks you for telling me more info about those conflicts in different cultures. I don't want to say who is right, but I will only focus on pure-technical things in future.

@lockdownguy

虽然绘图质量和精度确实不高，但这条路是确实存在的，只不过因为在沙漠中并不能很好的找到，同时名字会使人误认为这是历史上才有的道路。lockdownguy在osmcha的指控是不正确的
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108339568

这条路是没问题的，lockdownguy的bad标记完全莫名其妙，@lockdownguy 应当注意自己在osmcha上的言行
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108333837

虽然绘图质量和精度确实不高，但这条路是确实存在的，只不过因为在沙漠中并不能很好的找到，同时名字会使人误认为这是历史上才有的道路。lockdownguy在osmcha的指控是不正确的
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108281889

这条路是确实存在的，只不过因为在沙漠中并不能很好的找到，同时名字会使人误认为这是历史上才有的道路。lockdownguy在osmcha的指控是不正确的
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108280532

这条路是确实存在的，只不过因为在沙漠中并不能很好的找到，同时名字会使人误认为这是历史上才有的道路。lockdownguy在osmcha的指控是不正确的
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108279677

这条路是确实存在的，只不过因为在沙漠中并不能很好的找到，同时名字会使人误认为这是历史上才有的道路。lockdownguy在osmcha的指控是不正确的
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107790529

这条路是确实存在的，只不过因为在沙漠中并不能很好的找到，同时名字会使人误认为这是历史上才有的道路。lockdownguy在osmcha的指控是不正确的
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108176815

这条路是确实存在的，只不过因为在沙漠中并不能很好的找到，同时名字会使人误认为这是历史上才有的道路。lockdownguy在osmcha的指控是不正确的
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108176815

这条路是确实存在的，只不过因为在沙漠中并不能很好的找到，同时名字会使人误认为这是历史上才有的道路。lockdownguy在osmcha的指控是不正确的
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108176538

这条路是确实存在的，只不过因为在沙漠中并不能很好的找到，同时名字会使人误认为这是历史上才有的道路。lockdownguy在osmcha的指控是不正确的
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108176538