OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
142159824

您好,感谢您对边境地区的维护和巡查,虽然但是,单纯一个“test”做changeset comment很容易引起注意的,比如我就被osmcha里面的watchlist召唤来了,下次记得还是尽量写明白做了什么比较好!(尤其是避免单纯的“test”、“测试”‘、“更新”、“完善”之类)
比如这个changeset就可以写“删除已经在复合多边形中成员的冗余标签”之类
感谢理解!

142142543

您好,看起來您刪掉了非常多的點,請問它們是都不存在了嗎?

141627858

zsc雕像是什么雕像?是人名就写全人名,不存在的就不要到处胡乱加,谢谢!
我很好奇,这地方不是一个居民区建筑吗?怎么就成雕像了?

141490649

Note: 这种值都用标准值就好了,很容易在编辑器内前端映射成本地化的字符串,而且iD就是这么干的,又不是物种species写的都是拉丁学名

141459702

1. 这些区域并不是行政区划真实边界,真的行政区划边界请在关系里设为outer并加上boundary=administrative
2. 即使就是整个城区建成区画一个landuse=residential,也是不推荐的,因为城区绝对不是一个纯的居民区,它也有商场,也有学校,也有公园,所以也建议拆开用更精确更小的,一块一块的,街区级别的面要素

141459702

way351262732 <- node3700749896
way482860821 <- node5824761754
way982867984 <- node8540846917
way1000273199 <- node5782059512

141138642

吓到了是吧(挠头(其实是因为看到常州极其完善而北边的江阴一片荒凉,有一种美墨边境的感觉(就想能画一笔是一笔救一救长三角不平衡的地方了(当然实际也没搞多少(居然被您发现了啊,巡查有功啊(XD

138964092

@SomeoneElse @SomeoneElse_Revert

I noticed only ways was restored in 138965912 while 252 name removal in relations haven't been treated. Is it because the script used by revert has a bug? (Since those users are hidden, I can't check using a script to crawl their edit history)

141008677

涉及到的changeset有:

140483118 140483041 140482892 140482470 140482141

140483041

Reverted in changeset/141008677
See its comments for more detailed reason.

140482892

Reverted in changeset/141008677
See its comments for more detailed reason.

140482470

Reverted in changeset/141008677
See its comments for more detailed reason.

140482141

Reverted in changeset/141008677
See its comments for more detailed reason.

140483118

Reverted in changeset/141008677
See its comments for more detailed reason.

141008677

按照 osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information 中的标准:

Mapping private buildings, private roads (including driveways), private parking is considered as completely acceptable. Add access=private as appropriate to roads, parkings etc.

也就是说,画农田里的公共道路,并非仅仅属于某个具体的农户家里的道路,是完全符合规则的。而且它也可以被不特定的某几个人通行(虽然不少村子不准外人进村,可以access=destination
即使真的是和西方国家一样路权属于私有,禁止其他人通行(记得日本有一条上山路是这样),也可以access=private来解决。更何况中国的农场土地理论上是国有的。

141008677

因为每一个changeset里面都留言一遍所有想说的话的话,也实在太麻烦而太打扰了,但是如果不留下标记就很难知道已经被回退,所以就只去留下这个变更集的链接即可。

140225567

comment可以用中文写,毕竟是在中国编辑,可以假定足够活跃的人都懂

129952106

node/10236622701/history

真的吗?手动转的时候自然会明白,这里花家地南里的里,换成繁体依然是里(或者有人也说是裡)
而且如果一个地名写的并不规范,只是一股脑全都转换,后续要改的时候还要手动维护多个values,未免过于冗杂。

这个问题是在 https://t.me/osmchina/93467/112712 中由其他编辑者提出来的

138825304

======
抱歉!上面是我对wiki的解读不够到位,应该采用国际形式
您做的对

I'm sorry! The above is my interpretation of the wiki is not in place, it should adopt an international form
you are right

138825304

(Still machine translated, but I glance at it)

For another example, you changed the phone number to "+86 773 588 6611" in way/699616200, but as a local editor in China, it is obvious that "773" is because of removal of the area code of "0773"(Guilin, Guangxi) by mistake, and this is a landline phone number not a mobile phone number
According to the E.123 standard you are referring to, it should be

(0773) 588 6611

But I'm not sure my understanding of the E.123 standard is correct, so I would also like to get your opinion.

I think it is necessary to point out that in China, landlines and mobile phones use two different numbering systems, landlines have area codes, while mobile phones do not