Hello, I noticed that you use a [highway=Bus stop] tag on those 3 nodes node/10781948727, node/10781948726, node/10781942308 via 3 changesets, I wonder why you tag them like this. For example, if you want to add a bus shelter, you can tagged it with [amenity=shelter]+[https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shelter_type=public_transport]

Hope for your timely reply!

Hello, could you tell about www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182427424?
Why it was named with a single letter "P"?

@Dan8love

looks like you are mapping a bus route? If so, you'd better map it with relation, not simply leave a line.

Also, if those name are stop positions you can add a bus_stop node near the road.

---

@Ropino

I also found this strange tag from taginfo, and I suggest revert this? But I don't know how to get help with review from local community。

您好，OSM是一个全世界共同编辑并由所有人共享的地图，它并非您专属的标记存放库。因此如果您将个人使用的点标记在OSM上，它将被全世界所有人看到——这既不利于保护您的个人隐私，也对其他人是一种不礼貌的行为

其他人可能需要看到的是具体的确切的道路、建筑——但他们不一定都是您的救援队的成员，因此您可以直接告诉您的队员在某条路的交界处或者经纬度坐标为何的地方集合训练，而不是在OSM上创建一个点。

我已在 changeset/137796253 中删除了这个点

如果您有异议或者希望进行更深的讨论，您可以直接在本变更集下方留言，我将收到邮件回复。

感谢您的理解，祝您万事顺利。
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132339107

荣誉骑士哥哥，可莉也想大冒险，一起去玩吧~

+ https://www.xiaohongshu.com/explore/63037e2f000000001b007918
+ https://www.xiaohongshu.com/explore/62e36168000000002402e44e

因为 changeset/135260274 和 changeset/137747834 的编辑，Umweltzone Heidelberg 被移除，但在 node/3594831153 和 node/1266585680 上依然记载了限制通行的交通标志。想请您确认一下，类似这样的标志是否还在原地保留。

它是否还存在？（请您查看 changeset/137747834 的comments）
Does it still exist? (Please check the comments at changeset/137747834)
Existiert es noch? (Bitte überprüfen Sie die Kommentare unter changeset/137747834)

Umweltzone Heidelberg was removed due to edits in changeset/135260274 and changeset/137747834, but restricted traffic signs are still documented in node/3594831153 and node/1266585680. I would like to ask you to confirm whether a sign like this is still in place.
(Machine Translated) Die Umweltzone Heidelberg wurde aufgrund von Änderungen in changeset/135260274 und changeset/137747834 entfernt, Verkehrsbeschränkungsschilder sind jedoch weiterhin in node/3594831153 und node/1266585680 dokumentiert. Ich möchte Sie bitten, zu bestätigen, ob ein solches Schild noch vorhanden ist.

+ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zeichen_270.1_-_Beginn_eines_Verkehrsverbots_zur_Verminderung_sch%C3%A4dlicher_Luftverunreinigungen_in_einer_Zone._I,_StVO_2007.svg?uselang=de
+ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zusatzzeichen_1031-51_-_Freistellung_vom_Verkehrsverbot_nach_%C2%A7_40_Abs._1_BlmSchG_%E2%80%93_gelbe_und_gr%C3%BCne_Plakette,_StVO_2017.svg?uselang=de
+ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zusatzzeichen_1031-52_-_Freistellung_vom_Verkehrsverbot_nach_%C2%A7_40_Abs._1_BlmSchG_%E2%80%93_gr%C3%BCne_Plakette,_StVO_2017.svg

Die Diskussion beginnt hier: https://t.me/OSM_de/98574

It seems that this changeset only deletes the relationship without deleting the members in the relation. So I deleted its members in this changeset: changeset/137747834

---
(Machine Translated)
Es scheint, dass dieser Änderungssatz nur die Beziehung löscht, ohne die Mitglieder in der Beziehung zu löschen. Deshalb habe ich seine Mitglieder in diesem Changeset gelöscht: changeset/137747834

@Vpgb
He have 2 vandalism changeset, this and changeset/137687458

I only checked relation/13284766 history but haven't check others, can you review changeset/137686920(this) and changeset/137687458? Thanks!

Version 17 have a complete circle near relation/6646538 (独岛/竹岛) island

被回退的changeset： changeset/136966425

类似情况：
changeset/137227889 （被 changeset/137289181 退回）

请不要再犯这样的错误了！

已被 changeset/137289181 退回

I saw your comment, I accept various contact methods
Including but not limited to:
Email: keaitianxinmail@qq.com
Telegram Group: t.me/osmchina (Yes you can use English of course)
(or other method you'd like, such as PM)

But, in order to allow more other editors to participate, I prefer to use open communication channels, so I think it is more feasible to directly comment under the changeset or discuss in the most offen used telegram group in China's community.

It may take one to two days to gather mappers who have research on minority language tagging in local community, especially those living in Guangxi. I know a few of them, so I've left messages on their usual IM software.

Before that, I think your research in Xinjiang, Tibet, and Inner Mongolia can still continue

如果您看的见上述评论，我希望能得到您的回复

If you have seen the above comment, I look forward to your reply

Hello, I don't know if you can understand Chinese, so I will attach an English version to my above reply according to your locale.
First of all, thank you for your attention to the ethnic languages used in China's minority ethnic autonomous regions. But it is necessary to remind you that whether to use bilingual annotations in ethnic minority autonomous regions, and to what extent, is a very controversial issue with divided opinions among China community's local editors. You can read osm.wiki/Talk:%E5%B0%91%E6%95%B0%E6%B0%91%E6%97%8F%E5%9C%B0%E5%8C%BA%E8%AF%AD%E8%A8%80%E6%96%87%E5%AD%97%E6%A0%87%E6%B3%A8%E6%96%B9%E6%A1%88 to find out more about it. Looks like this debate can last for years, and I don't recommend making large-scale modification until the local community has settled on a final solution. It is currently generally considered acceptable to use bilingual labels in city names.
As a member of China's local community, I have also communicated with mappers living in Guangxi. In fact, in Guangxi, the lingua franca is only Chinese, and the existence of Zhuang language is basically not seen in daily life. It only appears as a symbol in official documents. This is different from Xinjiang, Tibet, and Inner Mongolia where ethnic languages are still widely used.
China legally divides 56 ethnic groups (Han and 55 ethnic minorities), the Hui do not have their own ethnic language, so theoretically there should be 54 ethnic languages - but only Uyghur, Tibetan, and traditional Mongolian are the only languages that are active and widely used in daily life in provincial administrative divisions.
Therefore, I do not recommend that you use bilingual tagging in Guangxi, or at least you should try to communicate with some mappers living in Guangxi before conduct such modification.

Thank you.

Best Regard. 顺颂时祺

您好，不知道您是否能懂中文，因此我接下来的回复会根据您的locale同时附上一份英文版本。
首先，很感谢您对中国少数民族自治区所使用的民族语言的关注。但有必要提醒您的是，是否在少数民族自治区域使用双语标注，以及在何种程度上使用双语标注，是一个非常具有争议且在中国本地编辑者中存在意见分歧的问题。您可以阅读 osm.wiki/Talk:%E5%B0%91%E6%95%B0%E6%B0%91%E6%97%8F%E5%9C%B0%E5%8C%BA%E8%AF%AD%E8%A8%80%E6%96%87%E5%AD%97%E6%A0%87%E6%B3%A8%E6%96%B9%E6%A1%88 来了解相关情况。这一争执可能仍将持续数年，我不建议您在社区确定最终方案之前进行大规模的修改。目前通常认为在城市名称中使用双语标注是可被接受的。
作为中国本地社区的一员，我也与广西的mapper沟通过，事实上，在广西，通行语言就是汉语，且日常生活中基本看不到壮语的存在，它仅仅作为一种象征出现。这与新疆、西藏、内蒙古仍有广泛的民族语言使用是不同的。
中国在法律上划分了56个民族（汉族与55个少数民族），其中回族没有自己的民族语言，因此理论上应该有54种民族语言——但能够在省级行政区划中广泛使用且保持日常生活中活力的只有维吾尔语、藏语、传统蒙语。
因此我不建议您在广西使用双语标注——或者您至少应该试着和几位居住在广西的mapper交流后再决定。

下次编辑前记得检查一下自己动了多少东西，你这个昭化古城怎么跑到北京去了？

Oops! Sorry for made a such big changeset! 😥

I got these two nodes through an overpass query, and I mistakenly thought they were both in Tokyo!

(Bow to you all)