Revert those all edit because most of those path added can not be trusted. List of this work can be seen at https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/2HkHbqm6pt/ .

This operation was conducted by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 via https://revert.monicz.dev/ , and vote approved in https://t.me/osmchina/124459/127354

Due to limit of revert tool, this time only revert those 10:

147772215
147732730
147714766
147697481
147696492
147696319
147672550
147643757
147636529
147599046

changeset/148097648

Revert those all edit because most of those path added can not be trusted. List of this work can be seen at https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/2HkHbqm6pt/ .

This operation was conducted by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 via https://revert.monicz.dev/ , and vote approved in https://t.me/osmchina/124459/127354

Due to limit of revert tool, this time only revert those 10:

147772215
147732730
147714766
147697481
147696492
147696319
147672550
147643757
147636529
147599046

changeset/148097648

Revert those all edit because most of those path added can not be trusted. List of this work can be seen at https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/2HkHbqm6pt/ .

This operation was conducted by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 via https://revert.monicz.dev/ , and vote approved in https://t.me/osmchina/124459/127354

Due to limit of revert tool, this time only revert those 10:

147772215
147732730
147714766
147697481
147696492
147696319
147672550
147643757
147636529
147599046

changeset/148097648

Revert those all edit because most of those path added can not be trusted. List of this work can be seen at https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/2HkHbqm6pt/ .

This operation was conducted by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 via https://revert.monicz.dev/ , and vote approved in https://t.me/osmchina/124459/127354

Due to limit of revert tool, this time only revert those 10:

147772215
147732730
147714766
147697481
147696492
147696319
147672550
147643757
147636529
147599046

changeset/148097648

Revert those all edit because most of those path added can not be trusted. List of this work can be seen at https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/2HkHbqm6pt/ .

This operation was conducted by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 via https://revert.monicz.dev/ , and vote approved in https://t.me/osmchina/124459/127354

Due to limit of revert tool, this time only revert those 10:

147772215
147732730
147714766
147697481
147696492
147696319
147672550
147643757
147636529
147599046

changeset/148097648

A tip for subsequent reviewers:
The above 31 changesets come from two blocked users (actually they may be the same saboteur)

>>> 南昌地主
['148082732', '148085761', '148085889', '148086076', '148086229', '148086575']
>>> 博股通金
['148011510', '148011647', '148011738', '148012024', '148012269', '148012667', '148012865', '148014391', '148014707', '148033613', '148033628', '148033694', '148033862', '148034757', '148035457', '148035589', '148038885', '148039862', '148040293', '148043382', '148044300', '148044478', '148077792', '148078188', '148078656']
>>> [len(南昌地主),len(博股通金),len(南昌地主)+len(博股通金)]
[6, 25, 31]

@woodpeck

Yes, 博股通金 is alt-account of 南昌地主, because he was block for 0 hour and he want to prove he is right, so he use the new account map unreansonable track.

And he was pointed out by many mappers in group chat this afternoon, maybe he feel angry and wanting to ruin everything.

Thank you for this quickly action!

Fushneg反而恰好说明是手打的？

不过我是建议如果不知道译名不写也行，毕竟中国大陆不是香港那种啥事都有双语名称的，中国大陆非民族自治地区就是单一语言的。

OSM不是随心所欲的涂鸦画板，您的编辑都意味着可能有依赖于OSM的导航软件误入歧途

#图为时而绘

这是最后的警告。如果我没有收到您就此的回复，我将于今晚开始使用自动化工具回退您的**所有**编辑，因为这些数据完全不合理。

OSM不是什么法庭，但我们有必要令数据尽可能按照相同的原则来绘制和处理，这才能保证它可以被很多人所用。比如我看您在这么陡峭的山上绘制了这么多highway=service，这显然并不符合常理。我不知道您是如何定义服务性道路（https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=service）的，但是显然和 highway=service 所描述的情况完全不相符

您要是就坚持认为自己英语不好看不懂，也有中文译本可供参考 osm.wiki/Zh-hans:Tag:highway%3Dservice

我觉得您需要停下来给我们一个解释。所有的评论都会以邮件形式发送到您的邮箱。

其二，已经有其他登山者指出您的路名山名等数据信息的来源问题，在 t.me/osmchina （中国社区的主要线上聊天室）中也有其他深圳和全国各地的mapper群友查县志、查政府公开资料、查其他各种来源的地图，都没找到您这些名字的来源

除非您能证明这是在登山群体里常用的名字，那至少能沾一点common used的边。

我们一直都在期待您做出正面回应，正面举证，但您全都无视了，我们没在公开场合看到您的任何态度。我觉得这不是一个好的社区合作的态度，社区合作一定是需要听取其他人的意见的。

南昌地主，您好

看起来您对您在梧桐山上的绘图非常自豪——至少我感觉到的是这样

首先，您在添加山路的时候，是否考虑过这条山路的可通行行？香港深圳等地已经非常具有热带气候的特点，我也咨询过菲律宾等其他热带气候的登山者兼mapper，他们都表示在这种气候下植物的生长是非常快的，半年不经过维护就会有很大的路径变化，我看您的数据来源是完全依靠esri/bing等卫星影像来绘制的，您是否能保证通过卫星影像就能确信这里存在道路？就我这五六年的OSM经验来看，不能。这是其一。

> Also you restored the old name, while the new name was not part of the problem.

Oh, really bad. I didn't notice the change in the name at first glance. I was too impatient when cleaning up the tags. I should have waited patiently for the editor to open.

Thank you @ivanbranco for pointing this out.

Therefore, I first changed the name back to "Contrada Fondaccio" used by @Mario Castagnoli in changeset #147485553, and commented on the process of this incident under his changeset #147466855.

> This place isn't in China, so don't cede your territory, XD

Sorry for every mapper disturbed by this changeset
I didn't expect that such a point( node/9492790712 ) was unexpectedly located outside of China, so a very large chunk of Southeast Asia was included.
This was unexpected because I just used level0 to quickly edit tags and failed to pay attention to the actual geographical location.

I will try to optimize this in future map edits

对于每一个被这个变更集打扰的映射者深表歉意
我没有预料到有这样一个点( node/9492790712 )意外的位于中国以外，因此东南亚的非常大的一块被包含在内了
这是意外，因为我只是用level0快速的编辑标签而没能注意实际地理位置

在之后的地图编辑中我会尽量优化这一点

提示您：

有其他本地编辑者对您的编辑提出质疑

请尽快回应 changeset/147378156 中的留言和讨论

如果您更习惯使用其他IM工具，您亦可查阅 https://t.me/osmchina/124459/124648 前后的关于应如何绘制梧桐山徒步旅行道路的讨论

（总的来说就是，很难判断是否存在的道路，基本就不要画，因为它们可能会误导其他山友，这是非常危险的；也会降低OSM的可信度。应以能实地复核为准）

> 高速公路的命名应当以实际为准

所以实地路牌上写的是“淮内高速”还是“内邓高速”？

我关心的是这点，而不是说你如何按照它通了多少没通多少去决定它的名字

京台高速甚至显然也没有通到台北，但也没妨碍它全都是这么叫这么称呼

https://imgur.com/a/8jydFSk （京台高速起点实况，网图）

参考资料

* http://www.qingzhou.gov.cn/detail/front/details/temp1665552428993040385.html
* http://www.qingzhou.gov.cn/detail/front/details/temp1641710598857842689.html
* http://www.qingzhou.gov.cn/detail/front/details/temp1635832518704590850.html
* http://www.qingzhou.gov.cn/detail/front/details/temp1632622172263079938.html
* http://www.qingzhou.gov.cn/detail/front/details/temp1643124169470865410.html

由于中国的网络限制，通常来自非中国大陆的互联网请求是无法接通的，但从法律角度它们确实属于Public Domain的数据，因为是行政性的公开