The network tag here is debatable. Theoretically we should consider each franchise a network, but using this reasoning fails for jointly-operated routes.

type=route
route=bus
ref=K58
network="港鐵巴士 MTR Bus"
operator="香港鐵路有限公司 MTR Corporation"

Please don't add invalid tags into bus routes.

There is no "brand" for routes 960X / 968X. (It does exist for Cityflyer routes or H1 / H2)

The designation should follow the schedule of routes order, i.e. "過海路線 Cross Harbour Route".

The network should have the same value as other routes in the area e.g. 960, 961, 962, 967, 968, 969, etc. because all these routes form a network. It is necessary that "network - ref" can identify the route.

"owner" and "ownership" are also invalid here. A bus route is not something which can be legally owned. It is only "franchised".

"passenger" is also invalid here as it is not a railway or train / ferry route. A bus route by its definition carries passengers.

"usage" is also invalid here. It is not a railway track.

I was driving from Wan Chai to Repulse Bay at that time.

The definition in the wiki does say it does not contain a road network in the circle. The existence of Tai Tam Reservoir Road with branches INSIDE the circle make the circle not meeting the definition already.

A circle which qualify will be the one near Kwun Tong Ferry Pier, or the one at Cherry Street / Hoi Wang Road. Upon arriving these junctions the road sign indicates a circle, there are no road inside the circle, and there isn't right of way in the circle.

When I'm driving through it using OsmAnd it tells me to use the 3rd exit at the circle, but I'm expecting to drive it straight on.

Also, the mere existence of the entry / exit of Tai Tam Reservoir Road inside the circle already disqualifies it.

Because it is not designed to handle a lot of thorough traffic, same as Western Street uphill.

The traffic signals should be put on the highway itself such that when a route is drawn on the map, the traffic signal passed on the map is the same as what you will drive through on the ground (please look at Kennedy Town where I checked the traffic signals from photos / videos / field check)

All traffic signals should be put on the highway itself

I don't think you can drive a motor vehicle into the path I modified.

I don't think this is passable by a motor vehicle.

You are saying Lesnoy-Morskoe is out of Lithuania so irrelevant. But shouldn't the mapping to be harmonised across the same geographic place even across a country border? Nida was mapped as a town and Alksnynė was mapped as a hamlet many years ago, just like Morskoye mapped as a hamlet and Lesnoy mapped as a village and everybody is happy in the southern part.

Also, how can the road "Taikos g." be reasonably marked as unclassified as it is one of the main road to Nida?! Everyone drives on it from Zelenogradsk to Nida!

The access roads to other villages on the spit, including Morskoye and Rybachy, are all marked "tertiary" with far fewer traffic due to the scale of the settlement!

Sorry, but I have to revert your revert because your revert has destroyed the improvement to the bus route 384

Well, how the officials say bears no resemblance to the reality. It contains only a few houses, that's all. Travelling to either Nida or Klaipėda requires traversing through large areas of forest.

The only settlement which resembles a town on the whole Curonian Spit, in my opinion, is Nida.

The tag place=town/village/hamlet etc. refers to the settlement itself, not including the surrounding forest where no houses can be legally built. Lesnoy/Rybachy/Morskoye/Nida/Preila/Pervalka/Juodkrantė/Smiltynė are clearly distinct settlements surrounded by forests, even some of them belongs to the same municipality. (Lesnoy - Morskoye belongs to the same Curonian Spit rural settlement administratively, but they are mapped as distinct villages / hamlets)

In some jurisdictions of the world, like China, a city / municipality as defined by the officials can include vast amount of forests and the so-called "municipality limit" can be as large as a province. If we mark those "towns" within city limit some 100 km from the city centre, separated by forests as "suburb", isn't it ridiculous?!

I visited there and nothing else apart from a few houses, how can't it be a halmet?

It is official policy for Hong Kong and Macau to use bilingual names, not our preference.

Chinese and Portuguese have equal status in Macau

Chinese and English have equal status in Hong Kong

Sorry, it is legally wrong to mark those short segments as motorway because in reality motorway laws don't apply on those segments. For example, you can drive a 100 cc motorcycle on those segments but not on motorways. Motorways have an indisputable strict legal definition, unlike other kinds of roads.

They are by definition NOT a motorway simply the law of motorway does not apply on those sections. The roads signs are not in green, there are explicitly end of motorway signs at Sam Shing, and there are bus stops at Hung Kiu as well.