◪ Jarv's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 125078813 | I don't believe that this restriction is correct. There is no signage on approach or on the signs saying no right turn or a mandatory left turn. There is a no right turns sign on the exit of the junction facing North, which is really badly placed as it actually refers to no right turn onto Kings Road, although cycles are able to. |
|
| 124578531 | Hi, you have used a wrong tag here. You added a node with highway=rest_area . This is used for rest areas off of a major road, but this has been placed within the city centre of Brighton where no such facilities exist. What were you trying to describe this place as? |
|
| 124317574 | Hi Ian, these bike stands you added look fine 👍. Welcome to OpenStreetMap as well!
|
|
| 123798811 | Hi IronVeil, Please ensure that if you are marking a road as prohibited for pedestrians, that there is actually a restriction on pedestrians. The vast majority of roads do not prohibit pedestrians, although they may be unsuitable for pedestrians. High Speed Dual Carriageways like the A27 may be unsuitable for pedestrians, but they still have a legal right to use them. Routers that use OSM data will however see that the road is marked as trunk, with a speed limit of 70mph and no pavement, and will avoid them for any significant distances. |
|
| 123625536 | I would have left it how it was. disused:highway = motorway_link shows that it is a highway, and disused as part of its lifecycle. disused:highway would suggest that the physical carriageway is still present, but disused which reflects the situation. It hasn't taken up any other purpose so doesn't need a highway tag to supersede that. |
|
| 123625536 | You have changed the old slip road into a service road. However this is not a service road. it is a completely abandoned motorway slip road which is not used for even service access. |
|
| 123143535 | Hi Hinks. Although this road is not suitable for walking or riding/leading a horse - it is not illegal and is legally permitted. Therefor setting the foot and horse tags as "no" is not correct. I've remove these tags from the roads now. Routing software should avoid suggesting pedestrians & horse riders from using this road as it is tagged as a "primary" road, along with a 70mph speed limit and no sidewalk tags.
|
|
| 122262466 | Hi Mark, Cycle contraflows are a mapping oddity in OSM, however
Have a read of the following wiki pages, they do somewhat contradict each other, but all do suggest that the best way is what I've done.
|
|
| 121300458 | next time you are making an edit could you remove this?
|
|
| 100074301 | I don't have the survey footage to hand for this change.
|
|
| 120514273 | Welcome to Open Street Map. Your edits seem to be fine at a glace, however when uploading/saving your changes, please ensure they are in a similar location (i.e. same town). Because in this changeset you have made edits in both India and the UK, it appears on all areas between that for people reviewing changes.
|
|
| 120424564 | The Westbound diverge shouldn't have a name or ref tag as it is not open to traffic, and there are no signs showing the junction number or name. Also the overbridge shouldn't carry the junction name either unless the road is known as that, which I think is unlikely.
|
|
| 120394963 | This looks like a zebra crossing not a Pelican.
|
|
| 120274221 | Changes reverted in 120277421. Please do not add fictional streets & changes to Open Street Map. Please view my comment on your first change for more information.
|
|
| 120273983 | Changes reverted in 120277421. Please do not add fictional streets & changes to Open Street Map. Please view my comment on your first change for more information.
|
|
| 120270647 | Changes reverted in 120277421. Please do not add fictional streets & changes to Open Street Map. Please view my comment on your first change for more information.
|
|
| 119776170 | Hi Hashtag Mappings. Welcome to Open Street Map.
If you have a look at some of the pages on the wiki you can find out how you can add information to the current map to make it better.
If you have any questions feel free to message me or any other mapper, or ask on the discord.
|
|
| 119753400 | Foot=No (what you added) is only used when signage explicitly says that pedestrians are not allowed. There is no such signage along the A2011, or a TRO to introduce such restrictions. I've changed this back but added that there are no pavements which better reflects the physical access arrangements. |
|
| 119133628 | Didn't change cs description.
|
|
| 118750719 | Good Evening UtterClutter,
Please could you remove the cycleway you added. |